Dna dating can genes help you pick a mate gay telephone dating service
Laber is, indeed, correct that he and his cohorts that women are performing some sort of Lysistrata-esque pork-out against white nationalists and their quislings…
it’s that their refusal to consider conservative boners contributes to increased political polarity.
There’s not even a pseudo-financial explanation that charity and altruism increase one’s value in the “sexual marketplace” and perhaps volunteering at the local pet shelter might spur women to overlook their chortling over “Grab ’em by the pussy” jokes. The men showed up in the first place, and so they’ve done their part; now women have to come across.
If you’re unwilling to do what it takes to be appealing to women, that’s your call. You’re welcome to demand that women lower their standards to include you, for all the good it will do.
As with other polemics within the Federalist “But Why Won’t They Date Us” genre, the entire argument is “well, you should fuck us because REASONS”.
There is no exhortation to the Federalist audience to actually do things that might make them more appealing to women, liberal women in particular.
“I’ve done as much as I’m going to do and doing any more is unfair,” they cry.
And then, when those dates don’t magically appear, they complain that women are being too demanding and should “give us sex, dammit,” which works about as well as you might expect.
People have always engaged in assortative mating of some kind or another, but as social scientist Charles Murray explains in his book “Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960–2010,” there was a shift to a particular type of mating in the ‘60s which continues through the present day.