Sex datingsider Ringkøbing-Skjern
Gallagher, 1990; Karnes & Oehler-Stinnett, 1986; Kerr, 1991; Manaster & Powell, 1983; Robinson & Noble, 1991; Roedell, 1984; Whitmore, 1980). And there are some children who fit the descriptors, according to parental judgment, yet fail to achieve scores in the superior range of the tests. Many times these children have weaknesses in multiple modalities, such as vision and audition, which severely depress their IQ scores. The descriptors were selected to meet the following specific criteria: (a) representative of the majority of children tested; (b) applicable to a wide age range; (c) generalizable to children of different socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds; (d) gender fair; (e) easily observed in the home environment; (f) brief and clearly worded for ease of interpretation by parents;(g) supported by research. The number of characteristics has increased in various versions. Data from the study were reported at the National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) 44 Annual Convention of NAGC for the Research Division in November, 1998 (K. Summaries of the studies were published in Copy Right Magazine, Limburg, The Netherlands, and in Young Gifted Kids, in British Columbia. A synopsis of the findings appears on the Gifted Development Center website: An earlier version, called The Silverman/Waters Checklist for Identifying Gifted Children, consisting of 16 items, was copyrighted in 1984.
In such cases, evidence of superior abilities may come from other sources than IQ tests, such as classroom performance or remarkable achievements outside of school. The characteristics in the scale also have been supported by other experimental and clinical studies, and in the professional literature: 1. The characteristics appear to be able to discriminate children who score in the superior and gifted ranges from those whose abilities are in the average range. Good problem solving/reasoning abilities (Davidson, 1986; Keating & Bobbitt, 1978; Parkinson, 1990; Sternberg, 1986). Rapid learning ability (Bloom, 1982; Hollingworth, 1942; Robinson, Roedell, & Jackson, 1979; Terman & Oden, 1947). Extensive vocabulary (Borkowski & Peck, 1986; Lewis, Feiring, & Mc Guffog, 1986; Loban, 1963; Terman & Oden, 1947). Excellent memory (Cohen & Sandburg, 1977; Freeman, 1985; Guilford, Scheuerle, & Schonburn, 1981; Lewis, Feiring, & Mc Guffog, 1986; Lewis & Michalson, 1985). Long attention span (Martinson, 1961; Rogers, 1986; Witty, 1958). Sensitivity (Clark, 1988; Strop, 1983; Piechowski, 1991; Roeper, 1982; Tuttle & Becker, 1980; Webb, Meckstroth, & Tolan, 1982). Compassion for others (Delp & Martinson, 1974; Lightfoot, 1951; Strang, 1958; Torrance, 1977). Perfectionism (Adderholdt-Elliott, 1987; Chamrad & Robinson, 1986; Clark, 1988; Freehill, 1961; J. Gallagher, 1985; Piechowski, 1979,1991; Piechowski & Colangelo, 1984; Schetky, 1981; Schiever, 1985; Silverman & Ellsworth, 1980; Whitmore, 1980). Moral sensitivity (Boehm, 1962; Drews, 1972; Gross, 1993; Hollingworth, 1942; Martinson, 1961; Munger, 1990; Passow, 1988; Roeper, 1988; Silverman & Ellsworth, 1980; Terman, 1925; Vare, 1979; Ward, 1985). Strong curiosity (Bloom, 1982; Cox, 1977; Freeman, 1985; Lewis & Michalson, 1985; Louis & Lewis, 1992; Munger, 1990; Parkinson, 1990; Terman & Oden, 1951). Perseverant when interested (Bloom & Sosniak, 1981; Brandwein, 1955; Feldhusen, 1986; Lewis & Michalson, 1985; Tuttle & Becker, 1980). High degree of energy (Feldhusen, 1986; Hildreth, 1938; Schetky, 1981; Whitmore, 1980). Prefers older companions (Gross, 1989; Freeman, 1979; Hildreth, 1966; Hollingworth, 1931; Lewis & Michalson, 1985; Mann, 1957; OShea, 1960; Robinson & Noble, 1991; Terman, 1925; White, 1985). Wide range of interests (Cox, 1977; Hitchfield, 1973; Terman &Oden, 1951; Witty, 1958). Great sense of humor (Getzels & Jackson, 1962; Hildreth, 1938; Hollingworth, 1926; Shade, 1991; Terman, 1925). Early or avid reader (Cox, 1977; Durkin, 1959; Gross, 1993; Kasdon, 1958; Martinson, 1961; Robinson, Roedell, & Jackson, 1979; Terman & Oden, 1951). Concerned with justice and fairness (Roeper, 1988; Rogers, 1986; Silverman & Ellsworth, 1980). At times judgment seems mature for age (Haier & Denham, 1976; Hollingworth, 1932; Warren & Heist, 1960). Keen powers of observation (Carroll, 1940; Martinson, 1961; Rogers, 1986; Witty, 1958). As of this time, they have not been shown to distinguish children at different levels of giftedness. Sex Telefon Ekster Bladet Bjørnø By Aftaler, Svenske Sexfilm Nn Thai Massage Arhus Sortsø Herpes Genitalis Symptomer Klitoris Vibrator Vålse Manedens Side 9 Mænd se billederne: nøgen-em i fodbold for kvinder - newsbreak.bruger cookies til at give dig en god oplevelse og til at indsamle statistik, der kan være med til at forbedre brugeroplevelsen.
For his dissertation, Martin Rogers (1986) compared nearly 100 developmental traits in gifted and average children, using a parent questionnaire with a Likert-type scale.